The fearsome Thoracosaurus, a dinosaur-era reptile from North America with jaws similar giant pincers, bears an uncanny resemblance to a modern fish-eating croc called a gharial.
 |
| Life reconsturction of the long-snouted Thoracosaurus, a fish-eating reptile from the Mesozoic era |
[Credit: Jacob Baardse] However, novel question led past times Flinders University shows that these similarities are all due to convergent evolution, which has repeatedly fooled scientists trying to reconstruct the identify unit of measurement tree of crocodiles.
The Indian gharial in addition to 'false' gharial both induce got long, narrow snouts for grabbing fish underwater.
Their similar deoxyribonucleic acid demonstrates that both gharials are closed relatives – therefore the so-called 'false' gharial is truly a truthful gharial.
The genetic prove farther suggests that gharials are a rattling immature grouping that evolved amongst modern mammals, peradventure thirty 1 M m years ago.
This scenario is at odds with the occurrence of ancient gharial-like fossils from the Mesozoic era called "thoracosaurs," which lived to a greater extent than than lxx 1 M m years ago.
H5N1 novel written report inward Proceedings: Biological Sciences has resolved this dilemma, using novel Bayesian techniques for inferring evolutionary trees which, dissimilar other methods, accept into consideration both the anatomy in addition to geological historic menstruum of fossils.
These analyses demo that the ancient thoracosaurs are non closely related to living gharials subsequently all, but are a totally split upwards grouping of ancient reptiles which had adopted a similar fish-eating lifestyle, in addition to evolved pincer-like snouts to match.
Thus, every bit predicted past times the deoxyribonucleic acid data, gharials did non be inward the Mesozoic; the presumed fossils were simply gharial mimics.
"The deoxyribonucleic acid of living gharials indicates they are a immature group, which evolved good subsequently the dinosaurs – but so why are at that topographic point gharial-like fossils older than T-rex?" says Pb writer Professor Michael Lee, from Flinders University in addition to the South Australian Museum.
"Either the deoxyribonucleic acid prove is wrong, or we've misinterpreted these ancient thoracosaurs."
"Our run suggests we've got the fossils wrong, subsequently beingness misled past times convergent evolution."
Convergent development is when animals inward similar habitats evolve similar adaptations, such every bit fins inward whales in addition to fish, in addition to wings inward bats in addition to birds.
The study's co-author doc Adam Yates, from the Museum of Central Commonwealth of Australia inward the Northern Territory, says the "long pincer-like jaws are ideal for grabbing fish underwater, every bit they tin orbit the sack slam closed chop-chop with minimal H2O resistance."
"It is non surprising that thoracosaurs in addition to modern gharials both convergently evolved nearly identical snouts, for feeding inward a similar means in addition to on similar prey," doc Yates says. "It seems the thoracosaurs are the 'true' simulated gharials."
Source: Flinders University [June 27, 2018]
Sumber http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com
The Indian gharial in addition to 'false' gharial both induce got long, narrow snouts for grabbing fish underwater.
Their similar deoxyribonucleic acid demonstrates that both gharials are closed relatives – therefore the so-called 'false' gharial is truly a truthful gharial.
The genetic prove farther suggests that gharials are a rattling immature grouping that evolved amongst modern mammals, peradventure thirty 1 M m years ago.
This scenario is at odds with the occurrence of ancient gharial-like fossils from the Mesozoic era called "thoracosaurs," which lived to a greater extent than than lxx 1 M m years ago.
H5N1 novel written report inward Proceedings: Biological Sciences has resolved this dilemma, using novel Bayesian techniques for inferring evolutionary trees which, dissimilar other methods, accept into consideration both the anatomy in addition to geological historic menstruum of fossils.
These analyses demo that the ancient thoracosaurs are non closely related to living gharials subsequently all, but are a totally split upwards grouping of ancient reptiles which had adopted a similar fish-eating lifestyle, in addition to evolved pincer-like snouts to match.
Thus, every bit predicted past times the deoxyribonucleic acid data, gharials did non be inward the Mesozoic; the presumed fossils were simply gharial mimics.
"The deoxyribonucleic acid of living gharials indicates they are a immature group, which evolved good subsequently the dinosaurs – but so why are at that topographic point gharial-like fossils older than T-rex?" says Pb writer Professor Michael Lee, from Flinders University in addition to the South Australian Museum.
"Either the deoxyribonucleic acid prove is wrong, or we've misinterpreted these ancient thoracosaurs."
"Our run suggests we've got the fossils wrong, subsequently beingness misled past times convergent evolution."
Convergent development is when animals inward similar habitats evolve similar adaptations, such every bit fins inward whales in addition to fish, in addition to wings inward bats in addition to birds.
The study's co-author doc Adam Yates, from the Museum of Central Commonwealth of Australia inward the Northern Territory, says the "long pincer-like jaws are ideal for grabbing fish underwater, every bit they tin orbit the sack slam closed chop-chop with minimal H2O resistance."
"It is non surprising that thoracosaurs in addition to modern gharials both convergently evolved nearly identical snouts, for feeding inward a similar means in addition to on similar prey," doc Yates says. "It seems the thoracosaurs are the 'true' simulated gharials."
Source: Flinders University [June 27, 2018]
Sumber http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com
Buat lebih berguna, kongsi:
